|
Security Basics
Application Firewall Jul 17 2008 02:14PM ams sec gmail com (3 replies) Re: Application Firewall Jul 18 2008 01:56PM ॠaditya mukadam ॠ(aditya mukadam gmail com) (2 replies) Re: Application Firewall Jul 30 2008 02:52PM Sanjay R (2sanjayr gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Application Firewall Aug 01 2008 09:00AM ॠaditya mukadam ॠ(aditya mukadam gmail com) (2 replies) Test Case on Firewall/IDS/Swithches and Routers/Load Balancer Aug 04 2008 07:23AM harshad mengle wipro com (1 replies) Re: Test Case on Firewall/IDS/Swithches and Routers/Load Balancer Aug 06 2008 04:51AM ॠaditya mukadam ॠ(aditya mukadam gmail com) Re: Application Firewall Jul 18 2008 03:20PM Bryan S. Sampsel (bsampsel libertyactivist org) (1 replies) |
|
|
Privacy Statement |
So is Borderware.
IPCOP has aspects that qualify.
No, the ASA is a packet filter only firewall. It's quite good at what it
does, but it does not handle the application layer. And no, deep packet
inspection does not qualify.
O'Reilly made an awesome firewall book that you should read. It's a
little dated, but the concepts are solid: Building Internet Firewalls.
For most of 'em, you'll need some coin. Neither Sidewinder nor Borderware
come cheap. IPCOP is ok for a SOHO setup, perhaps as many as 25
users...not sure beyond that. But it's not engineered to be an enterprise
solution...though I'm sure someone has created a flavor of it that is.
Application proxy firewalls do give you some additional protection over
straight packet filter firewalls. If you're talking a massive enterprise,
it takes more hardware to drive it as well, as there is some footprint
increase because of the proxies themselves. However, when a user goes out
through a proxy, a hardened IP stack protects them, as no direct
connections are made between client and remote end. With a packet filter,
the client talks directly to the remote end.
Hope that helps a bit.
Sincerely,
Bryan S. Sampsel
LibertyActivist.org
ams.sec (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can anyone please list out some name of application level firewalls. Would
> Cisco ASA qualify as a application firewall? I have heard it needs certain
> addons to provide application screening functionality. Thanks a zillion.
>
> Ams
>
[ reply ]