, SecurityFocus 2002-09-24
A raid on the alleged author of a well-known hacker toolkit is raising eyebrows among electronic civil libertarians, and putting security researchers on guard.
Expand all |
Post comment
'T0rn' Arrest Alarms White Hats, Advocates
2002-09-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
'T0rn' Arrest Alarms White Hats, Advocates
2002-09-25
Brian Potter (1 replies)
Brian Potter (1 replies)
'T0rn' Arrest Alarms White Hats, Advocates
2002-09-25
KVS (1 replies)
KVS (1 replies)
'T0rn' Arrest Alarms White Hats, Advocates
2002-09-25
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
'T0rn' Arrest Alarms White Hats, Advocates
2002-09-26
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
more on 'T0rn' Arrest Alarms White Hats, Advocates
2002-09-26
JConner (3 replies)
JConner (3 replies)
more on 'T0rn' Arrest Alarms White Hats, Advocates - making situation "absurdum"
2002-09-30
Oleg Kirillov
Oleg Kirillov
Then they should also arrest Smith, Wesson, Kalaschnikow
2002-09-28
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)

Sure, it may be obvious that a rootkit was made with bad intent. But there are still valid reasons for making/owning/using one. Same with guns. It may be obvious that guns/bullets with armor piercing abilities are made with bad intent, yet there are guns/bullets out there which have these properties and do not require any kind of permit to make/own/use. Pretty much all the argument for keeping armor piercing guns/bullets hold true for rootkits.
Some people just like to have these guns/bullets, they are collectors. Same with rootkits/code.
Some people use them for research, they learn from them. Same with rootkits/code.
Some people enjoy using them legally on their own property. Same with rootkits/code.
Just because a majority of people use something for bad does not mean we should make it illegal. America was built apon concidering the little guy when making choices.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/813/16640#16640