Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Strikeback, Part Deux
Tim Mullen, 2003-01-13

Why I should have the right to kill a malicious process on your machine.

Comments Mode:
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
llamatron (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Miles (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Chris Caydes (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Stealthbadger (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
The Self-Defense Argument is flawed... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Shawn Duffy (5 replies)
The Self-Defense Argument is flawed... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Bob
So what do you propose doing if you're the target of a DDOS attack? Is there a good way to block traffic from attacking machines, while allowing traffic from legitimate machines, and preventing your network from being overwhelmed? Seems to me that if there were tools available to automatically identify attackers and shut them down (or better yet, simply shut down the attacking process) then an attacked network could recover from an attack as soon as it fights back, rather than simply waiting for the attacking machines to get bored and go away (or relying on the aparently incompetant sysadmins of those machines to fix themselves.)

In your analogy about being broken into, strikebacks are not the equivalent of chasing down the intruder and shooting them in the back. They are the more like shooting back while you're being shot at. Remember - this is about machines that are ACTIVELY attacking your network.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/134/17705#17705
Important differences. 2003-01-15
Stealthbadger
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback strategies CAN'T stop Nimda... 2003-01-13
Nicholas Weaver
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Valhalla
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
HalbaSus
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
pjf@thinkage.ca (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
MULLEN'S A KOOK 2003-01-14
Soum YnonA (1 replies)
MULLEN'S A KOOK 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Ronald
NIMBDA - bad example 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
k.lichtenwalder@computer.org
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
pha153
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
James W. Meritt, CISSP, CISA
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Dan
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Striking Back 2003-01-15
Peter Schultz
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Ryan Weaver
What if the Worm Closes the Door? 2003-01-15
Rick.Miller@Linux.org
Malicious "Neutralizing Agent"? 2003-01-15
Rick.Miller@Linux.org
3 strikes 2003-01-15
Jeremiah Blatz
Strikeback, Part Deux -- vacinations 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux -- vacinations 2003-01-23
Dr. Vesselin Bontchev
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
CounterAttacking is your right 2003-01-15
Anonymous
They just don't get it, do they? 2003-01-15
Concerned Netizen
Your "Right" is Wrong 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Examples are flawed. 2003-01-15
Bob James
No Automation 2003-01-15
Jeff Licquia
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, accountability 2003-01-15
hobbsk@ohiou.edu
security = ethics 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-16
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
M. Durrant
Strikeback - Think b4 you dump 2003-01-15
Dimitris (1 replies)
Strikeback - Think b4 you dump 2003-01-16
Anonymous
The rule of Law 2003-01-16
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-16
Anonymous
You shoot them...they shoot you back? 2003-01-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
You shoot them...they shoot you back? 2003-01-18
Johnny Ringo
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-21
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-21
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous
Rights and defenses 2003-01-23
Dr. Vesselin Bontchev (1 replies)
Rights and defenses 2003-01-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Rights and defenses 2003-01-25
Anonymous
Legalities 2003-01-23
Anonymous
You are already lost 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Wrong again Timmy 2003-01-24
Unknown







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus