Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Strikeback, Part Deux
Tim Mullen, 2003-01-13

Why I should have the right to kill a malicious process on your machine.

Comments Mode:
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
llamatron (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Miles (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Chris Caydes (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Stealthbadger (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
The Self-Defense Argument is flawed... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Shawn Duffy (5 replies)
Important differences. 2003-01-15
Stealthbadger
The Self-Defense Argument is flawed... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
>Someone breaks into your house and you notify them that
> you have a weapon or you point your gun at them... if the
> intruder starts to make an escape, you CANNOT chase them
> down and shoot them!!! And that is what the Strikebacks
> are all about... chasing down a potential intruder
> and "shooting" them and you CANNOT do that.

Your analogy is flawed. An attacking script/worm/whatever is not an intruder trying to escape, its an intruder that continues to attack and invade your home, regardless of how many guns you brandish to warn him off.

As such, the intruder should be shot.

Moreover, if a bank robber steals my car and uses it during a holdup, my car may get bullet holes shot in it from the police or private security guards. Yet, I have no legal recourse to be compensated from the security guards for the damage to my "stolen vehicle." I must seek compensation from the thief whole stole the car in the first place.

Now, replace thief with hacker, and car with server, bank with database, and security guard with SysAdmin. The picture becomes very clear, and quite obvious.


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/134/17758#17758
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback strategies CAN'T stop Nimda... 2003-01-13
Nicholas Weaver
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Valhalla
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
HalbaSus
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
pjf@thinkage.ca (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
MULLEN'S A KOOK 2003-01-14
Soum YnonA (1 replies)
MULLEN'S A KOOK 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Ronald
NIMBDA - bad example 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
k.lichtenwalder@computer.org
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
pha153
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
James W. Meritt, CISSP, CISA
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Dan
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Striking Back 2003-01-15
Peter Schultz
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Ryan Weaver
What if the Worm Closes the Door? 2003-01-15
Rick.Miller@Linux.org
Malicious "Neutralizing Agent"? 2003-01-15
Rick.Miller@Linux.org
3 strikes 2003-01-15
Jeremiah Blatz
Strikeback, Part Deux -- vacinations 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux -- vacinations 2003-01-23
Dr. Vesselin Bontchev
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
CounterAttacking is your right 2003-01-15
Anonymous
They just don't get it, do they? 2003-01-15
Concerned Netizen
Your "Right" is Wrong 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Examples are flawed. 2003-01-15
Bob James
No Automation 2003-01-15
Jeff Licquia
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, accountability 2003-01-15
hobbsk@ohiou.edu
security = ethics 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-16
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
M. Durrant
Strikeback - Think b4 you dump 2003-01-15
Dimitris (1 replies)
Strikeback - Think b4 you dump 2003-01-16
Anonymous
The rule of Law 2003-01-16
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-16
Anonymous
You shoot them...they shoot you back? 2003-01-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
You shoot them...they shoot you back? 2003-01-18
Johnny Ringo
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-21
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-21
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous
Rights and defenses 2003-01-23
Dr. Vesselin Bontchev (1 replies)
Rights and defenses 2003-01-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Rights and defenses 2003-01-25
Anonymous
Legalities 2003-01-23
Anonymous
You are already lost 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Wrong again Timmy 2003-01-24
Unknown







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus